Amanda Lang, Peter Munk, and Barrick Gold

an edited version of this piece appeared in Now Magazine.

Amanda Lang has been under fire lately for conflicts of interest regarding her reporting on the CBC. Specifically, Lang took money from two insurance companies while giving those companies favorable coverage. More recently, Lang was exposed by online news source CANADALAND for her aggressive lobbying against CBC’s Kathy Tomlinson’s reporting putting RBC in a bad light. When her attempts to bury the story were unsuccessful, she welcomed RBC CEO Gord Nixon on The National for a softball interview, where he dismissed Tomlinson’s reporting as trivial.

Not only did Lang accept money for speaking at RBC-sponsored events at least 6 times (for fees of up to $15,000 an event), but recent revelations reveal that she has been in a relationship with RBC Board Member W. Geoffrey Beattie since at least January 2013.

This isn’t the first time that Lang has gone out to bat for a corporate affiliate of a romantic partner. In a 2011 interview, Lang praised Barrick Gold after her guest, Jon Allan of Occupy Canada, accused the company of killing 19 Tanzanian villagers. Lang’s husband was Vince Borg, former Executive VP of Corporate Communications at Barrick Gold. When he left Barrick only a year earlier, Barrick’s press statement revealed that he would “continue to provide strategic communications counsel” and that he would “also be working with Founder and Chairman Peter Munk, in his other business and philanthropic endeavors.”

“Now you’re getting into a company that I know pretty well,” Lang stated as she interrupted Allan’s accusations. “My husband worked for Barrick Gold for years, so I don’t want to talk about that. Although, there are those who would say that Peter Munk has done amazing things for Tanzanians among others, creating great wealth where there was none.”

Creating great wealth where there was none? That’s big praise for a company whose mines in Tanzania displaced 40,000 small scale miners at their North Mara mine, and 200,000 at their Bulyanhulu mine. These small scale miners are now so desperately poor, that they dig though Barrick’s waste dumps for rocks with trace amounts of gold, often risking being shot at or beaten by mine security.

Often, these miners pay corrupt police to allow them to dig through newly blasted ore from Barrick’s North Mara mine. When a disagreement erupts over compensation, people often get killed. Jon Allan was likely referring to a Globe and Mail report citing a Legal and Human Rights Centre of Tanzania report concluding that 19 villagers were killed by police and security guards at North Mara from January, 2009, to June, 2010. A recent Vice Magazine investigation put the number much higher at 69 over 3 years, citing Wilson Mangure, a local ward councillor who has been tracking the incidents.

An incident where six people were killed at the North Mara mine is the centre of a lawsuit in the UK High Court by London law firm, Leigh Day.

“Unfortunately, these are not isolated incidents. We are aware of many other instances in which local people have reportedly been seriously injured or killed at ABG’s mine,” said Leigh Day partner, Richard Meeran in their statement announcing the lawsuit.

Despite the fact that these killings are regular and well-documented, CBC has done scant coverage of the reality next to these mines, and the lawsuit has not received one mention. A search of on google for articles about Barrick’s Tanzanian operations reveals 17 stories, only two of which even mention these regular killings. In their reporting of the killings at the centre of the Leigh Day lawsuit, the headline reads “Africa Barrick gold mine attacked” only latter to reveal that “seven intruders* were killed and a dozen more were injured Monday at its North Mara mine in Tanzania.”

These “intruders” once worked that land, and now risk their lives picking rocks in Barrick’s waste dumps. Rather than creating great wealth where there was none, it appears that Barrick has stolen great wealth and militarized entire communities to maintain it. But you would never guess that reading the CBC’s reporting.

*this number was later modified to 6

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Dirty “Pragmatism” of a True Capitalist: Peter Munk on Indigenous Rights, Equality, and what society needs

Peter Munk has become rather famous over the years as a man who speaks without the constraints of political correctness, or really any sort of correctness at all. From praising Pinochet to simultaneously acknowledging and dismissing acts of gang rape by his own employees, Munk’s words offer a rare glimpse at the mind of a man who has achieved high status of Canadian business world.

In a recent interview with the Economist, Peter Munk again speaks his mind, not realizing that he was, in fact, making a total ass out of himself. I will provide some excerpts, alongside necessary context, here to illustrate my point:

ECONOMIST: Indigenous groups appear to have a lot more say and power in resource development these days.

MUNK: Globally it’s a real problem. It’s a major, major problem. Why? Because human rights and NGOs and young students are idealistic, like we all were, and the underdog gets their support.

He goes on to talk about how these Indigenous people are “manipulated by very bad lawyers” and that “it doesn’t matter how much you deal with the majority of indigenous people, there is always a splinter group that will go for a lawyer who represents them and who makes legal claim after legal claim”.

Compare this to a Globe and Mail comprehensive feature on Pascua Lama, where journalist Stephanie Nolan admits that “in Chile today, you could spend a very long time trying to find anyone with a good word to say about Pascua-Lama.” In Alto del Carmen, Nolan explains:

“people were glad to have the new opportunities that might come with the mine—but not at the cost of their current way of life, or their water. ‘People here have a strong relationship with their land—the people don’t want to work in mining, they work their land,’ explains Jorge Villar, the town’s administrator. A former finance manager, he moved to the valley a few years ago, drawn by its hypnotic landscape and the peaceful life it offered. In Pascua-Lama, he saw potential jobs and revenue for the town. But most of his new neighbours, he soon realized, did not. ‘They’re not interested in the mining company offering them big salaries. Because if you change their way of life and their environment, what are they going to offer their children and their grandchildren?'”

Munk further explains why the churches seem to turn against his mines as well. “Unfortunately, churches in these tiny communities often also don’t like the fact that suddenly their people, who were totally dependent on them, now have high-paying jobs. They can send their kids to be educated in big cities,” Munk explains. But Munk of course is twisting the truth here. Most of the jobs go to people from outside of the Huasco Valley, where the primary industry is agriculture. And of course the churches are supporting a popular moment against his mining project.

Munk’s articulation of his distorted worldview did not stop there. He railed against the Indigenous people that were bringing his company to court to protect “constant and steady unperturbed enjoyment of their rights”, clearly angered that they were standing in the way of a few thousand jobs.

Munk then admits that he “was pretty left wing when I was in college because I believed that every human being had the same rights. You live in this idealistic, beautiful, morally inspired world of correctness. You don’t realise until you get a bit older that pragmatism has to prevail. Unless you can create jobs, unless you can create wealth, unless you can create tax revenues this society will not last much longer.”

Pragmatism must prevail? The Pascua Lama project impacts the sole water source in an arid valley for tens of thousands of people. Meanwhile, gold mining is an unnecessary practice as we get over 3 times are practical use of the substance from recycled sources*. Apparently, Peter Munk thinks that it is pragmatic to destroy the earth in pursuit of things that we don’t need. It seems like if we continue to use vast fresh water resources and pollute the land, our environment’s ability to sustain us won’t last. Something’s got to give, and I’m happy to give up gold.

*according to the World Gold Council, 11% of gold is used for anything other than jewellery or investment. Meanwhile, we get 35-37% from recycled sources.

** The Title “The Dirty Pragmatism of a True Capitalist” was taken from the comment section of the Economist article, suggesting that Munk’s views represent the views of a wider community.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Peter Munk, Barrick Gold, and the U of T: 2 events!

At Barrick’s annual general meeting this year, Barrick Gold is set to add David Naylor, former president of the University of Toronto, to their board of directors. Naylor was president of UofT during the signing of the controversial and secretive “Munk Contract” which established the Munk School of Global Affairs. Find out how the Munk School has been used to meet Peter Munk’s foreign policy objectives so far. Learn the inside story about how this contract was approved. And engage in a broad discussion (participation encouraged) about what this means for students at the University and the public at large.

WHEN: Thursday, April 24 6:30pm 
WHERE: 252 Bloor St., OISE, room 5150
WHAT: Discussion and storytelling: Munk, Barrick, and the UofT

*this is an accessible venue

This event will feature Sardar Saadi, recent U of T graduate and organizer of Iran in Review, who will speak about the Munk School’s problematic conference on Iran.

WHEN: Tuesday, April 29 6:30pm
WHERE: Harvest Noon 16 Bancroft Ave (upstairs)
WHAT: DINNER TALK Story-telling and art making: Munk OUT of UofT • Naylor OUT of Barrick Gold!


Cost: FREE to attend; reserve an optional $5 locally sourced vegan dinner by signing up here (we’re having savoury baked apple stuffed with lentils, veggies and flavour, along with green salad, freshly baked bread and hummus).
RSVP for dinner here:
DEADLINE to reserve dinner is Tuesday April 29th at 9am.Facilitator Bio: Sakura Saunders has researched Barrick and worked directly with Barrick-impacted communities around the world for over 7 years. With a background in journalism, she is the co-founder and editor of, a portal to news articles, backgrounders, and testimonies about Barrick Gold. She is active in the Munk OUT of UofT campaign that started with Peter Munk’s controversial and secretive contract with the university that was exposed in 2010.For More Information About Munk OUT of UofT please visit: event is part of Mining Injustice Solidarity Network’s (MISN) April Spring Into Action. For more upcoming events, check out:

*this is unfortunately not a wheelchair accessible venue

APRIL 30: Confront Barrick Gold!!!

WHERE: 255 Front St,
WHEN: 11am, Wed. April 30
FB EVENT: here

Barrick destroys communities around the world in their pathological quest for a metal that we no longer need to mine. Join us as we stand in solidarity with communities directly impacted by this gold mining giant!

This annual general meeting is taking place while:

• Barrick is facing a court case in the British High Court seeking damages for the death and injury of local villagers in Tanzania.
• Communities in Papua New Guinea are making urgent calls for resettlement away from the mine site and community members are compensation for killings and sexual assault.
• Communities in the Dominican Republic are also seeking urgent relocation away from the contaminated mine site, and to be compensated for their economic losses from dead cattle and contaminated produce.
• Indigenous Diaguita communities in Chile are fighting to stop the Pascua Lama project, which does not have their consent and has been poisoning their scarce water resources.
• Communities on Marinduque Island in the Philippines are seeking damages from a mine tailings disaster, considered the worst mining disaster in the Philippines.
• Barrick is being sued for fraud by their own shareholders because they lied about meeting environmental regulations in Chile and the cost and time estimates for their Pascua Lama project.

***Musical Performances by Amai Kuda, Test Their Logik, and more! ***

Please come out and support the communities negatively affected by Barrick. Through grassroots solidarity, we can ensure that their perspectives and needs are heard loud and clear in Toronto!

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Silence is Gold Film Screening

1379824_735045403193131_201022402_nJoin us for the Toronto premiere of SILENCE IS GOLD, a film that explores the state of free-speech in a corporate dominated world. This screening is co-presented with the MiningInjustice Solidarity and Point of View Magazine. Sakura Saunders and guest speakers will be in attendance.

WHEN: Tuesday April 1, 2014
WHERE: The Bloor Cinema, 506 Bloor St. Toronto
FB Event:

Julien Fréchette / Canada / 2012 / 77 ‘ / French / S.T. English

What are the limits to freedom of speech? Can we put a price on our spoken and written words? Following the 2008 release of the book Noir Canada, author Alain Deneault, his co-writers and his publisher, Éditions Écosociété, grappled with these questions – at great personal expense – after being sued for defamation in Quebec and Ontario courts by two large Canadian mining companies. Deneault and his publisher fought back, becoming entangled in a seemingly never-ending spiral of judicial proceedings. Silence Is Gold is a thriller of a documentary that tells their story, set against the backdrop of the Canadian justice system. We follow the complex procedural twists and turns, eagerly anticipating a resolution that is repeatedly delayed.

Filmmaker Julien Fréchette’s camera and questions lead us through this little- understood legal territory without judging or wading into the merits of the cases. His gaze is both subtle and attentive as he tactfully immerses himself in the story, initiating a dialogue with Alain Deneault, who becomes the protagonist of the film. Silence Is Gold raises crucial questions about Canada’s role and responsibilities in the global mining sector, the limits of free speech and equitable access to the Canadian justice system.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ex-UofT President David Naylor gets named to Barrick Board of Directors

If there was ever any doubt that the Munk School’s creation was marked by corruption and secrecy, this revelation should confirm our long-standing suspicions. This week, Barrick announced that it would be adding ex-University of Toronto President, David Naylor, to the companies list of “independent” directors. This appointment comes just four years after Naylor signed the controversial “Munk Contract” in secret, by-passing even the school’s governing council.

The contract named the school “in perpetuity” after Munk, laid out conditions under which Munk could oversee the school’s programs, and mandated that all announcements and publicity concerning the School and the donations be made in consultation with Munk. The contract also gave the sole ability to cancel the contract to the Munk Foundation.

Despite the fact that this contract carried with it a host of ethical and governance concerns, it was approved by only a handful decision-makers at UofT, including David Naylor, in a highly irregular process.

At a Governing Council orientation session on September 10, 2009, the Chair informed governors that the first Council meeting scheduled for October 22, 2009 would be cancelled due to insufficient items on the agenda. This cancellation was invalid according to the Council’s By-Law 2 because it had been decided upon by an online ballot that at that point, had not been ratified by the Executive Committee. It was also highly irregular given that the first cycle of meetings of the Governing Council had not been cancelled in over ten years. This meeting cancelation also allowed for the extension of Summer Executive Authority which was delegated on June 23, 2009 and allowed for the concentration of decision-making powers with the President, Chair and Vice-chair of the Governing Council, in consultation with the Chairs and Vice-Chairs of the Boards and Committees until December 10, 2009. It was during this extended period of supposed inactivity at the Governing Council that the donation and memorandum between the Munk Foundation and the University – signed on behalf of the Governing Council – was approved without any form of consultation with governors or with the students, faculty and staff.

The Secretary and Chair of the Governing Council also did not make any effort to inform Governing Council about the decision, memorandum and donation at the December 10, 2009 meeting of the Governing Council- as is the practice (to report on any and all approvals made under Summer Executive Authority).

In fact, it was not until several months later – on April 12, 2010 – that the members of Governing Council were first made aware of the proposed Munk donation. In a confidential memorandum from the Assistant Secretary of the Governing Council, Henry Mulhall, asked the governors to consider a proposed change to the name of the School of Global Affairs to the Munk School of Global Affairs. Governing Council members were given just 24 hours to register their comments. Even at this late stage, the details of the donation and memorandum were withheld from the governors and the University community.

Now, it appears that Naylor’s favours have returned to his personal coffers. Despite having no background in mining, the UofT ex-president has a seat on Barrick’s board of directors.

This is not the first controversy to surround the Munk school appointees. Michael Ignatieff, former head of the Liberal party, was rumoured to have Munk School ties when he chose to not show up to vote for a Liberal Party-sponsored bill that would have introduced minimal standards for Canadian mining companies operating abroad. The Bill – C-300 – lost the vote by a mere 6 votes, with Barrick Gold singled out

Munk OUT of UofT drops a banner during a class that Naylor guest lectured in Convocation Hall at the University of Toronto. (April 2011)

Munk OUT of UofT drops a banner during a class that Naylor guest lectured in Convocation Hall at the University of Toronto. (April 2011)

as the number one opponent lobbying against the bill. Less than two years later, on September 7, 2012, Ignatieff joined the Munk School as a half-time professor.

Another controversy involving a Munk-appointee involves Marketa Evans, the founding director of the Munk Centre for International Studies. Ms. Evans was appointed as the first Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Councillor for the Canadian government, whose job it was to mediate disputes between mining companies in impacted communities.

Marketa’s position was criticized by many as being “designed to fail”. Corporations could enter or leave the process at any time voluntarily, and most did. Of six cases opened during Evans’ tenure, who resigned in October of this year, three were closed after the companies walked away — the most recent in September of this year. One case was sent back to a company’s internal process and two remain open. Critics say they expect no resolutions to result.

The Munk School’s next director Janice Stein, is no less controversial. Stein openly supported the dismantling of Canada’s International Development Agency to merge with the Department of Foreign Affairs, being quoted in several articles and writing an editorial in the Globe and Mail supporting the move. Meanwhile, the merger was part of a shift in CIDA to start supporting CSR projects for mining companies abroad, including Barrick Gold.

A bit closer to home, Stein visited a Munk OUT of UofT organizing meeting once, insisting to get a chance to speak. She poorly defended the Munk contract and then took questions from the people present. One Munk OUT of UofT coalition member, Angela Regnier, who was then Executive Director of the UofT student union, asked a question about the SLAPP suit that Barrick Gold had against three academics in Montreal. Janice said that she didn’t know about the case, but would follow up with Angela, taking her card. Within days, Angela received both an e-mail and phone calls from Barrick’s lawyers, with vague threats about the spread of “misinformation” by the Munk OUT of U of T campaign. Thankfully, Angela’s primary issue in life is academic freedom, and so she proceeded to continue her support for the campaign and spoke openly about her encounter with Barrick’s lawyers.

So, Naylor’s appointment is not the first, and likely won’t be the last corrupt relationship between the University and Barrick Gold, forwarding the interests of mining within the structure of a School of Global Affairs.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Peter Munk Puppet shows it’s UofT pride today!


munknocchioMunk OUT of UofT and the crew from OPIRG made it out earlier today to show some UofT pride at the UofT parade to the Lupe Fiasco show. He was carrying a banner that read “Peter Munk Corporate Criminal: Munk OUT of UofT”.

We were overjoyed when we heard some UofT students leading “Fuck Peter Munk!” chants proving that despite the corporate influence, folks at the UofT can still keep it real.

If this is your first time visiting this site, please check out the Munk Primer and the “must-see” video in our sidebar. All of our information is accurate and we site our sources most of the time. If you have any questions about the information on this site, please drop us an e-mail and we’ll be happy to address your concerns!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Peter Munk, UofT & Barrick Gold: Info Session

Screen Shot 2013-04-10 at 7.20.50 PMWHAT: Peter Munk & UofT info session
WHERE: UofT @ OISE, 252 Bloor room 5150
WHEN: Tuesday, April 16, 6:30pm
SOCIAL MEDIA: Facebook event
WHY: To learn about the implications of the infamous “Munk Contract”.

The Munk Contract which established the Munk School of Global Affairs was signed in secret and not publicly available until a Freedom of Information request put out by two professors. The details turned out to be scandalous.

Find out why the U of T now houses a right-wing think tank. Find out what we mean when we say that Munk’s donation came with “strings attached”. Find out about Barrick’s history of threats to academic freedom. And find out what this all means in the bigger picture.

The event will be hosted by researcher and activist, Sakura Saunders, who will take you on a tour that starts with a contract and ends with the take over of public institutions, the repression of the truth, and corporate impunity.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Training a new generation of corporate apologists? The Munk School and the Globe and Mail

ols-man-shwoing-wasteIn the rural highlands of Papua New Guinea (PNG), a Canadian gold mine operates amongst the Ipili people, who were one of the last major ethnic groups to be contacted by the Australian colonial administration of New Guinea, or “white man”, in 1939. Since that date, Porgera was known for its rich gold deposits and eventually became the site of one of the largest gold mines in the world. Today, Porgera is a site of controversy, as it riches are overshadowed by stories of gang rapes and killings of the Ipili people at the hands of Barrick security and police.

Last week, a remediation program proposed by Barrick Gold was criticized by Mining Watch Canada and other human rights organizations for forcing victims of gang rape to sign away their rights to sue the company in exchange for redress. Barrick’s offer came two years after a 2011 Human Rights Watch report exposed a “pattern of violent abuses, including horrifying acts of gang rape”. Mining Watch’s report also criticized the fact that Barrick was offering no compensation to women who were gang raped by PNG Police, despite the fact that the police were housed, supplied and fed by Barrick during their time in Porgera.

The Globe and Mail was quick to react, releasing an editorial entitled “Barrick has done its best to improve human rights at mine in Papua New Guinea.” The article praised Barrick while insisting that it seemed “fair” that women receiving remediation could no longer sue the company. Meanwhile, it chastised Mining Watch for failing to acknowledge Barrick’s change for the better.

While the Globe acknowledged that is was “regrettable” that Barrick had not acted on the allegations of gang rape before the Human Rights Watch report was released, it failed to acknowledge that Mining Watch was one of the many organizations that had brought allegations of gang rape to the company years before Human Rights Watch was on the case, only to have these allegations repeatedly denied by the company.

This isn’t the first time the Globe and Mail has gone to bat for Barrick with fawning editorials immediately following accusations of human rights abuses. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Student Rejects his degree at UofT due to University’s Munk ties

I, Michael Vipperman, intend to renounce the degree I am being offered from the University of Toronto on June 14, 2012, in protest over the ongoing commodification and bureaucratization of education at this University, best exemplified by the increasingly intimate relationship between the University and such venemous institutions as Barrick Gold and the World Bank. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Cry of the Andes Film Screening (free)

Journey to the heart of the Andes Mountains where ‘Pascua Lama’ is poised to become the world’s largest open pit mine. However, for the indigenous people and farmers living in the valley below, Pascua Lama threatens their only source of water in one of the driest places on earth. In a war between corporate and social values two men are leading a fight to defend their valley and way of life. Now, one election will ultimately determine the true price of gold.

Learn about the personal journey and political fight of the Diaguita peoples in defense of their territory as they travel to Toronto, the corporate headquarters of Barrick Gold a company infamous for human rights violations and threats to intellectual freedom. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment